The Policy

 "Justice is turned back, and righteousness stands far away, for truth has stumbled in the public square, and uprightness cannot enter".

Isaiah 59:14.

I had a most peculiar encounter yesterday. After receiving an automated call informing me that a delivery would be arriving up to three hours late, the delivery driver rang me and the following conversation ensued...

"Are you one of our regular customers?"

"Yes".

"How narrow are the roads near to you?"

"well, perhaps a tad narrow in a few places".

"I'm on your estate... so I'll use the trolley. Please keep an eye out for me".

Well, I kept an eye out, and as the driver delivered my goods, he explained that he'd been involved in 'an accident' early in the week in a narrow roadway, so 'the policy' was now to not drive along "unknown" roads... in case of 'narrow regions'.

I wondered if this was 'policy' for the business he worked for, or merely something he'd decided upon himself due to his experience. Either way, it spoke a great deal to me in respect to our present circumstances.

MP David Davies made an impassioned statement this week about the necessity for the very civil liberties once more being threatened with cessation in the months ahead, but much more than this, he exposed the Government's bare faced hypocrisy concerning vaccine passports, comparing this week's Tory conference (where none were required as large numbers socialised for hours) to a visit to a leisure venue (where they are, or shortly will be), noting that this entire approach has nothing to do with public safety, and everything to do with coercion (by the way, the original link for this statement was pulled by You Tube shortly after it went live, so hopefully the link I have here will still be operating!).

"Policy", as the first report into the official UK response to the crisis this week shows, was a woefully lack-lustre and misguided thing in every respect, bar one - the vaccination program. This has been pursued and pushed with a resolve and industry that matches the tracing program of South Korea last February - the continuing roll-out now pervades almost every age-group in the population, and will almost certainly, as is now on the agenda states-side, finally include infants.

Any criticism of this, especially when it seeks to query the materials employed, is deemed conspiratorial in the most deplorable of forms (social media now actively culling it almost entirely), and this leaves Christians with a serious problem.

The Prophet Isaiah speaks of the evacuation of truth from the public forum and that this leads to a time devoid of righteousness. The very next verse tells us that the consequences of such a lack is that we become 'prey', and also those who will know God's displeasure.

Why, then, do so many believers follow a line concerning these 'vaccines' that view it entirely viable to use them on the basis of what is deemed "remote material co-operation" (in this case, a cell-line derived, but not actual material that was taken from an aborted child)?

The argument appears to be that because of this 'distance', there is, in essence, no actual evil directly involved in respect to the vaccine's recipient, but as others have already noted the reason that this is possible at all is because our society condones such murder continually and, in reality, this manner of immoral use is perpetual, so is there, in truth, any "remoteness" whatsoever?

Church authorities and the like may like to play such games, saying those of us who say this approach (deliberate murder of the unborn is evil, and so is the use of their remains - period) is wrong are, in their opinion, suffering from nothing more than a miss-placed conscience, but this is, in the light of scripture, an evil which merely compounds the vile sin of the original death.

Sin isn't something that just ends in the moment in occurs. The continual damage it brings about destroys us (James 1:15), especially as the prophet shows in respect to the dismantling of truth and the dissolution of what is truly upright.

The church is principally sided with the policy that there is a single solution to this present trouble - a single experimental material which is clearly doing a great deal of harm amongst a significant proportion of those who receive it, and a clear strain of ongoing contamination amongst an even larger number of those who continue to receive a third or even fourth dose. In the meantime, stringent Government policies are refusing to see the value that has come about either through the building of natural immunity in the population, or the effectiveness of other workable treatments against the virus. This has left the majority of the church crippled and paying homage to a policy that is clearly dangerous and derived from evil. This cannot be good.

It is my hope that as this tragedy continues, more Christians will awaken to the awful poverty of this and repent for the wickedness brought upon us by such a policy.