Thursday 12 August 2021

Uprooted

 "These are the blemishes in your love feasts, looking always first to themselves - fruitless trees, twice dead when they should be fruitful, uprooted... wandering stars, for whom the unceasing gloom of utter darkness is reserved forever". Jude 12 &13.

"The Church of England has totally capitulated to market forces and managerialism. The tendency is to view the local parish as some inherited embarrassing knick-knack from a great aunt that you wish was permanently left in the attic". Alison Millbank.

"Risk assessments have been ordered before Civil Servants can return to workplaces...on the basis that not everyone will be vaccinated, raising the prospect of ongoing limits to number. The Government was 'alive' to the concerns over vaccines and how not all employees would be vaccinated, warning people 'might refuse to come back if colleagues aren't jabbed' ". Danielle Sheldon.

You do not need to look very far in real terms to discover just how often the innocent are readily defined as the guilty by those in power. When a particular unjust law becomes the premise for imposing violence and unwarranted penalties on such victims, we begin to see how readily society can throw entire communities away merely to uphold its idealised 'status quo'.

The serious consequences of the recent pandemic here in the UK began to rapidly drop several months ago, requiring a scramble recently to excuse the nightmare projections about the recent easing of restrictions. The far more worrying issue is how the state is encouraging a culture whereby those who have ethical or serious issues with certain policies are to be deemed excluded from as much of normal life as possible.

It would be easy for us to read such an approach as a mistaken national initiative, when in truth the situation informs us that a far larger geo-political goal is in play - it is no coincidence that such policies are presently being rolled-out everywhere.

It has also all been evidenced so many times before. 9/11 witnessed America and her allies at war in the Gulf amidst peoples who were entirely detached from what had happened in New York, but the pretext allowed certain interests to be served, whatever the collateral damage.

The interests being served now negate entirely the value and even the place of genuine community.

The established church speaks openly of 'virtual' worship on-line as a key component to what's ahead, marginalising any attempt keep what is good for the future. Society in general is now huddled around continually active screens attuned to the shamans of mainstream and social media for the 'correct' perception (and thereby the enticing rewards) of what is sanctioned and equitable for the 'defined' members of the emerging, respectable company of the 're-set' world. Those who determine to query such 'progress' due to reasonable concerns find themselves continually given a single choice - shut down your apprehensions and sign-up, or you will silenced.

The tipping-point has now begun to become evident amongst us. Companies have begun to implement procedures for easily dismissing those deemed no longer required due to lacking vaccination. Church organisations have already stipulated that state requirements on this matter must be complied with by workers or rejection will be absolute. This, of course, is a familiar pattern in all the annuals of tyranny, and once it has taken hold, there will be no means of stopping its inexorable 'progress' to where it must end - a world which allows 'membership' only when every criteria is properly met, and where any deviation is punished.

Once the infrastructure is in place we will evidence the true severity of social control. Observers have been noting for some time how internet 'crashes', sometimes across whole nations, have become an increasing issue in recent times, so it does not require a great leap to see how this 'threat' could quickly become the means for requiring users to ascribe to far more stringent controls over their usage in order to 'protect' them. The current on-line safety act is a clear step in this direction.

Whilst, no doubt, there will be those who earnestly seek to move us away from such pitfalls, the more moderate voices are what the powers are endeavouring to mute in the areas of general hearing.

Sometimes, what is vetted or kept in the background is too awful to contemplate.

In June of last year, we witnessed the discharge of some 25,000 patients back into care from hospitals, where it is evident that they were abandoned by the Health Service, not receiving the most basic 'shielding' (testing) necessary in the process. The reasons and the consequences in this matter are plainly abominable (see, for example, section 14 of the Coronavirus Act, which allowed the removal of key obligations required by the NHS to discharged patients, as stated in the 2012 regulations, clauses 21(2) a and 21/12).

In the next few months, we will begin to witness our society shedding hundreds of thousands of those deemed 'excluded' due to its abhorrent discrimination required by its new controls (passports) and absolute requirements (vaccinations), which will now perpetuate to ensure 'safety' for the vulnerable (however many jabs, masks and rules are imposed).

The troubling reality, as currently evidenced in Israel, is that the vaccines (including the new booster shot) are not diminishing the ability of the virus to thrive, especially amongst the vaccinated, and it may well be that the application of this approach (as opposed, for example, to providing prophylaxis, as delivered by Ivermectin) proves fatal as the new variants appear. The likely narrative to spring up around this will be that only total vaccination can achieve recovery, but such an approach is in clear dispute with the known facts... There is another agenda.

Policies implemented by emergency powers last March are about to reach a very chilling culmination in the coming necessary "adjustments".

Last year, we were placed on a 'war footing' because the "enemy" was amongst us. Such an action allows all manner of action not permissible in peace time, but this clearly was not 'war' merely upon an infection, but against the very fabric of normal life.

My hope is that such sobering considerations will begin to release us from the vice-lock of the present fear to speak up regarding what needs to be understood to see proper health restored to us all.

No comments: